InfoQube is a complicated program with many capabilities but it is difficult for a new user to understand.
It is very easy for a new user to feel lost, partly this is due to not knowing where everything is but its because the program is capable of doing so many different things, when faced with so many possibilities a new user might think “What the F*&@ should I do now ?”, option paralysis is a well known phenomenon in psychology.
InfoQube is almost completely opposite to Microsoft OneNote, with OneNote the user interface is superbly designed to help the new user and to make the operation of the program obvious. But the program itself sucks, many of its capabilities are superficial and gimmicky. They are included just so that the advertising department can tick the box saying it has that capability. If you use OneNote for any serious work then you come up against its limitations very quickly. It is a typical product of Microsoft ‘focus groups’ which tend to make things so they are easy for the new user and difficult or impossible for the power user.
InfoQube on the other hand does not have a user interface which is simple and intuitive. The user interface is very dense. What do I mean by dense ? It is packed with sub menus, drop downs and context menus and some of the sub menus have sub menus. This can be confusing for a new user who doesn’t know where everything is.
There is a lot of depth to this program, but it can be intimidating to a new user. I am still learning and so I am sort of a new user but I don’t feel lost anymore. I was helped a lot by finding the option to customise menus and toolbars and experimenting with what I could and couldn’t move and/or get rid of.
Toolbars can have icons taken out of them and other icons put into them. New toolbars can be defined. The same is true of menus, the menus themselves are fixed but the contents of each menu can be changed. There are a few things in the menus which are fixed and you have to work around these entries but you can almost completely re-arrange everything else.
I was not aware how customisable InfoQube was until I went looking for the command to set up keyboard shortcuts. In the sub menu there was an entry called ‘Customize’ (pardon the Americanism but that’s the way its spelled in the program). This is a key feature and shouldn’t be hidden away in a sub menu. Once I found out what it was capable of I dragged it up one level onto the ‘Tools’ menu between ‘Help’ and ‘Options …’ where I would have expected to find it in the first place.
I then butchered the interface until I was comfortable with it.
I am now using the cut down interface. I have deleted many of the capabilities of the program, the things I am not interested in.
- Like Pivot Tables and Pivot charts, since Microsoft Office is no longer installed on my system I can’t use these anyway.
- Like sending e-mail to InfoQube, someday I may want the capability to send information to my InfoQube database from anywhere or for others to do so but for now I’m not interested.
- Like Gantt Charts, maybe one day I will have to manage a project and if that is the case then I will be grateful for this capability but for now its something I don’t need.
These facilities are still there, they have just been deleted from the user interface. If they are ever needed then they could easily be re-introduced.
Without all the stuff I don’t need and with the stuff I do need re-arranged I have a sensible manageable, comprehensible (to me) interface. Actually I haven’t taken that much out, but in the process of re-arranging things I became much more familiar with where things are. I have assigned a new set of keyboard shortcuts so that the operations which are common to the other programs I use are now in familiar locations where my fingers can find them on their own without too much thought.
So, what have I got left ?
I have a two pane organiser similar in operation to MyInfo with the columns in the left hand pane similar to Myinfo but it has the dockable panes which can be detached and placed on the other monitor just like Ultra Recall and it has a form of hierarchical tagging similar to ConnectedText. It has the ability to assign different meta-data to different items like Ultra Recall and the capability to have saved searches like the $ASK command in ConnectedText (except the results appear in a table (grid) not on a page).
The hierarchical tagging is not native to InfoQube but it shows the flexibility of the program that something like this is possible with only the things which are already built in.
I am aware that I am not using InfoQube to it’s full potential but the question is, do I need to use the program to it’s full potential ? If it does what I need then that is enough and the extra capabilities are there if I ever need to use them. I didn’t use ConnectedText to it’s full potential either. So what! If InfoQube does become my main note taking program then my usage of other parts of the program would possibly expand over time.
If only the linking of pages (placing a link on a page which links to another page) was as good as ConnectedText then I could rebuild my ConnectedText wiki within InfoQube.
Moving lots of data over to InfoQube has highlighted the fact that the import facilities of InfoQube are very rudimentary unless you are importing from EccoPro or Evernote.
This is the reason I have not done a load test on InfoQube, importing a couple of thousand text files is only practical if it can be automated. I suspect InfoQube would perform rather well in such a test but I cannot say that for certain until I do the test. If I drag and drop files to the left Pane then all I get is links to the files on disk, the file contents aren’t inserted into the database.
The pace of development of InfoQube is quite rapid and things have changed (for the better) since my review. I look forward to seeing what new developments are coming. If there are substantive changes then it may be worth doing a second review.